The Federal Circle

May 172012
 

By

Google’s got data. And this time it shows that the top six countries ranked by smartphone adoption may not be the ones you’d guess. According to Google’s latest study, Australia, the United Kingdom (UK), Sweden, Norway, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) all boast smartphone adoption rates above 50%. There are seven countries that follow not far behind with adoption rates over 40%. They include the United States, New Zealand, Denmark, Ireland, the Netherlands, Spain and Switzerland.The new research has me wondering a little about the Asia Pacific region and why it doesn’t have higher adoption numbers, but the study does point out that people who own smartphones in China and Japan are typically heavy users. Sixty eight percent of smartphone owners in China search for information on their mobile devices daily. And Japanese owners are known to multitask with their phones regularly. The Google study found that 80% of Japanese use their devices while consuming other media, including 53% who use their phones while watching TV, and 30% who do so while accessing the Internet on a computer.

If you want to do your own visualization of Google’s new data, the company has also fed the results from its latest study into a chart-making tool it introduced last fall. Here’s a chart I created showing the length of daily online sessions among smartphone owners in China and Japan.

Google’s full data sets are also available online, as well as country-specific summary reports.

LinkedInShare
May 172012
 

By

Since it entered the popular imagination, crowdsourcing has been seen as an approach for bringing in ideas from the world outside corporate walls.

Now, crowdsourcing is becoming a mainstream business practice, and in many cases, it’s unfolding as an internal activity targeted at bringing employees into the business decision-making process. Strategic planning is unfolding as the area particularly well suited for crowdsourcing.

In a new report, McKinsey’s Arne Gast and Michele Zaninishow describes how crowdsourcing is working its way into the decision-making processes of leading corporations. What a great way to shake up calcified or biased planning processes, they observe. Enhanced employee engagement leads to greater financial health, Gast and Zaninishow add. However, they state, it’s important that middle managers be sold on the process as well.

Gast and Zaninishow describe some mainstream corporate crowdsourcing initiatives:

Rite-Solutions, a software provider for the US Navy, defense contractors, and emergency responders, developed an internal stock exchange called “Mutual Fun.” With this stock exchange, “would-be entrepreneurs” can pitch internal ‘IPOs’ and sell stock at $10 a share up to $10,000 in play money. “When an IPO gains momentum and breaks into the company’s Top 20, the initiative is funded with seed money.” The company has surfaced 15 new ideas as a result of its internal IPO system.

HCL Technologies, the IT services and software-development company opened up its business-planning process, which formerly involved a few hundred top executives, into an online platform open to more than 8,000 employees across the organizations. “A surge of advice followed. The inclusive nature of the process helped identify specific ideas for cross-unit collaboration and gave business leaders a chance to obtain detailed and actionable feedback from interested individuals across the company.” Knowing their documents would be open to scrutiny, managers prepared more honest and action-oriented documents.

Red Hat, the open-source platform company, employed wikis and collaborative tools for its planning process, to generate and organize ideas so that any employee could respond with comments or suggestions. Gast and Zaninishow observe that the new process resulted in a “significant change in the way the company offers virtualization services for enterprise data centers and desktop computer applications” — and even resulted in a new corporate acquisition. This type of move “would have been unlikely in the days when the company used its old, less inclusive planning process.”

3M opened up its strategic planning process to all of its sales, marketing, and R&D employees through a Web-based forum called InnovationLive. Over a two-week period, InnovationLive “attracted more than 1,200 participants from over 40 countries and generated more than 700 ideas. The end result was the identification of nine new future markets with an aggregate revenue potential in the tens of billions of dollars.” Since then, Gast and Zaninishow observe, “3M has held several additional InnovationLive events, and more are on the way.”

AEGON, an insurer, launched a digital-networking platform called AEGON Square, which facilitated communities of practice and idea sharing on regarding corporate strategy. “In the end, 3,000 employees, 85 percent of the total, participated over 12 months.”

(Photo: Wikimedia.)

LinkedInShare
May 172012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

http://www.smashwords.com/books/view/53236

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Very few entrepreneurs take the time to really study their company from the perspective of an investor. Those that do are often initially frustrated by what they see as a heartless and antiseptic assessment of the object of their passion and dedication. But, if they fight through those self-justifying tendencies and come to understand the investors perspective, they can substantially improve their chances of fathoming the process and, perhaps, of getting funded. The investor’s world is quite different from the entrepreneurs in many ways. But there are also similarities. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 172012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
www.Dr-Smith.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You are the gatekeeper to your own future. If you don’t give yourself permission to enter that future you will live without every experiencing it. Giving Yourself Permission: http://www.dr-smith.info/giving-yourself-permission/ . Have you faced that need and what did you do? Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 172012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

In the first three parts of this series I discussed major areas of focus for investors considering funding a company. Briefly, they were:

  • Implementation – Are the founders implementing or just talking about implementing once they get the funding?
  • The Value Proposition – How scalable is the business model, what are the margins and are they sustainable? Have the founders proven that they can monetize the value proposition?
  • The Team – Is the team balanced, experienced and operating as a team? Are there weak members? Are they a team or a gaggle? What are the tracks in the snow that show that they can build and manage a company?

Generally these and many more questions have to be answered satisfactorily before a professional investor turns to the financial projections provided by the founders. Amateurs will start with them, but this is more an indication that they are amateurs than anything else. Financial projections need to be analyzed within the context of well developed and tested knowledge of the team that is providing them. Otherwise, you are looking at a series of spreadsheets that may or may not be realistic or reliable projections of an achievable future. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 162012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Many of my engagements begin with a phone call from an investor. Most often they are concerned that the company they funded is in real trouble and/or is teetering on the brink. These can be melancholy calls because there is often little for me to do but conduct a postmortem – to figure out what went wrong and help the investor and entrepreneurs avoid making the same mistake a second (or third) time. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 162012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prior articles in the series:

Of Course … The Tragic Mistake – Part One: Diagnosis

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Towards the end of my session with the CEO, she asked me to propose an engagement focused on fixing the problems which we had been discussing. “Help me drive the ‘of course’ beast off the field,” was the way she put it. Such requests should not be approached, let alone complied with, lightly. From the first in this series you will remember that it was the CEO herself who was the major facilitator of the difficulties – it was her tendencies that were at the root of the problems. Her plea was far more personal than those that might underlie a typical consulting engagement. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 162012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Prior articles in the series:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Let the Coaching Begin!

It was one thing to reach an agreement on the focus and goals of the coaching engagement but another to actually kick the process in gear. I could tell by her body language that the CEO was nervous about getting into the thick of things. In such situations, I find it useful to begin with more of an intellectual discussion. Somehow, working with concepts softens apprehensions and allows the discussion to begin in what feels like a safer place. And so, that is what we did. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 162012
 

The report, “We Have Met the Enemy … And He is Us,” is based on a comprehensive analysis of the Kauffman Foundation’s more than 20 years of experience investing in nearly 100 VC funds. It illustrates a persistent pattern of inflated early returns in funds that may be used to raise subsequent funds and shows the poor historical performance of funds with more than $500 million in committed capital. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare
May 082012
 

Dr. Earl R. Smith II
Managing Partner, The Federal Circle
DrSmith@Dr-Smith.com
Dr-Smith.com

A well constructed and professionally managed advisory board can bring amazing benefits to a company. A poorly designed and managed one is usually a colossal waste of resources. The difference often lies not so much in the idea of an advisory board, but in the execution of that idea by the senior management team, and particularly the CEO, of a company. In many cases, the productivity of a company’s advisory board is an indication of the effectiveness and sharpness of focus of the senior management team. Continue reading »

LinkedInShare